<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"><channel><title>ryan.sh</title><link>http://ryan.sh/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:56:02 -0400</lastBuildDate><item><title>Spock, rationality and reasons for Truth</title><link>http://ryan.sh/2010/08/04/spock-rationality-and-reasons-for-truth/</link><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Spock’s emotional state is always set to “calm”, even when wildly inappropriate.  He often gives many significant digits for probabilities that are grossly uncalibrated.  (E.g:  “Captain, if you steer the Enterprise directly into that black hole, our probability of surviving is only 2.234%”  Yet nine times out of ten the Enterprise is not destroyed.  What kind of tragic fool gives four significant digits for a figure that is off by two orders of magnitude?)  Yet this popular image is how many people conceive of the duty to be “rational” - small wonder that they do not embrace it&amp;nbsp;wholeheartedly.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Just a sample of the amazing facility for instance possessed by Eliezer Yudkowski, a self-taught &lt;span class="caps"&gt;AI&lt;/span&gt; researcher and guy behind &lt;a href="http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/1/Harry_Potter_and_the_Methods_of_Rationality"&gt;Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#8217;ve been slowly working my way through his writing over the past few months and can&amp;#8217;t recommend him&amp;nbsp;enough.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ryan Witt</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 20:56:02 -0400</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">tag:ryan.sh,2010-08-04:2010/08/04/spock-rationality-and-reasons-for-truth/</guid><category>philosophy</category><category>rationality</category><category>link</category></item></channel></rss>